Transforming Youth Justice in Australia

The Diagrama Foundation's proven therapeutic approach reduces recidivism and builds stronger communities. Discover a cost-effective, human-centered approach to youth justice.

Comparison

Diagrama vs Australia

Australia
Approach
Punitive, Detention-Focused
Recidivism
70%
Cost Per Young Person
$1 million+ AUD annually
Focus
Security, Containment
Restorative Justice is Limited & Underfunded
Facility Operators | Government & Private Providers
High Staff Turnover, Limited Relationship Building
Disruption to Education, Low Attainment
Diagrama (Spain)
Approach
Rehabilitation & Reintegration
Recidivism
13.6% (6-year period)
Cost Per Young Person
€70,000 ($110K AUD) annually
Focus
Education, Skills, Personal Support
Restorative Justice is an Integral Part of System
Facility Operators | Public & Non-Profit
High Staff-to-Youth Ratio for Individualised Support
Emphasis on Educational Attainment

The Diagrama Model

Discover how the Diagrama Model is transforming youth justice with education, rehabilitation, and real second chances—a proven alternative to high-cost, high-recidivism detention.

Voices of Transformation

Hear from those impacted, youth justice experts, Diagrama staff and Indigenous knowledge holders
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Group of Young People in Alicante
Young Person
Young Person Spain

"The rules that are in the center are very important. The rule that is here, the schedule, is what we have any person in any house."

Group of Young Men Murcia
Young People
Young Person Spain

"The measure is to occupy your head. The more activities and things you do, the better because time flies by."

Young People Murcia
Young People
Young Person Spain

"They’re more open here, you can leave to the centre when you are good, there is always activities to do and even play ping-pong."

Jesús Teruel
Coordinator
Diagrama Staff

"Our centres are not just places of confinement; they are spaces for growth."

Chelo
Social worker
Diagrama Staff

"It's much more about adding and teaching them. And look, certain obligation, as rights they have, to do things."

Amelia Martinez
Residencia Socioeducativa
Diagrama Staff

"If you really want your action to provoke a future change, you cannot intervene exclusively by punishing. You have to intervene in all the factors that could have influenced that person currently functions as they do, but at all levels."

Javier Aparicio Grau
Educator
Diagrama Staff

"They are still people the same here as those outside. And I think the treatment with people, as far as I'm concerned, I think I do well."

Enrique López
Civil servant
Diagrama Staff

"It's about combining a bit of control with the educational, affective, and attentive part. Just as with our own child we would also do that."

David Romero McGuire PhD
CEO
Diagrama Staff

"Change is possible when we provide the right support at the right time."

Kate Bjur
Executive Director for Research and Advocacy, Peakcare
Australian Supporter

"It's actually about implementing things that we know works, but also having the patience to follow through with that course until we see the outcomes."

FAQs

By learning from Spain’s success and adapting it to Australia’s unique cultural and community needs, we can create a system that works for young people, their families, and the broader society. Below, we answer some of the most important questions about why reform is needed and how it can happen.

1. What is the Diagrama Model?

The Diagrama Model is a youth justice approach from Spain that prioritises rehabilitation over punishment. It operates on the principles of education, therapeutic support, and reintegration rather than confinement and strict security. Youth detention facilities under this model are managed by non-profits, ensuring a focus on care rather than profit​.

2. How does Spain’s youth justice system differ from Australia’s?

Spain’s system focuses on re-education and reintegration, while Australia’s system remains largely punitive and detention-based. Key differences include:

* Higher minimum age of criminal responsibility (14 in Spain vs. 10 in Australia).
Greater judicial involvement in a child’s progress post-sentencing.
Less reliance on physical security measures in youth facilities.
Stronger vocational and education programs aimed at long-term rehabilitation.

3. What are the main benefits of the Diagrama approach?

* Lower recidivism rates – only 13.6% of youth in Diagrama facilities reoffend within six years, compared to Australia’s 80-96% recidivism rate within 12 months​.
Cost-effective – it reduces taxpayer burden by preventing reoffending and investing in vocational and educational pathways.
Not for-profit institutions – youth justice in Spain is not privatised, unlike in Australia, ensuring the focus remains on care rather than profit​.

4. Why does somewhere like Queensland need youth justice reform?

Queensland has Australia’s highest rates of youth detention, with 60% of detained youth being Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander. The current system is punitive, expensive, and ineffective, as up to 96% of young people reoffend within 12 months of release.

5. What role does cultural connection play in youth justice reform?

Cultural connection is critical for rehabilitation. Indigenous-led programs have proven effective in reducing reoffending by strengthening identity, family relationships, and connection to Country. Justice reinvestment models focus on community-based support rather than detention.

10. What makes the Diagrama Model different from traditional youth detention?

The Diagrama Model is fundamentally different because it prioritises rehabilitation over punishment. Instead of isolating young people in high-security detention centres, it provides:

Education and vocational training as a core part of daily life.
Small, home-like units with a maximum of 12 young people per group.
Close relationships with educators, who live, eat, and work alongside the youth.
A progressive sentencing system, where youth transition through open, semi-open, and closed settings based on their progress.
* This approach has proven to lower reoffending rates and help young people reintegrate successfully into their communities.

Still have questions?

Send us a message