Strategic litigation, searchable.

Escobar Larin v. Garland (24-1428)

US court opinion from Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 23-2088, 24-1428 JOSE RODOLFO ESCOBAR LARIN, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. PETITIONS FOR REVIEW OF ORDERS OF THE BOARD OF IMMIG

CASE OF K.J. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (no. 27584/20)

Whether the applicants' expulsion to North Korea would expose them to a real risk of death or torture, violating their right to life and the prohibition of inhuman treatment, and whether their pre‑expulsion detention in Russia complied with the right to liberty and security.

East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v Biden, No. 23-16032 (9th Cir. 2024)

Executive limits on asylum eligibility; APA challenges; statutory consistency

CASE OF M.D. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (no. 60778/19)

Whether the applicants' removal by Hungarian authorities constituted a collective expulsion of aliens in breach of the prohibition under Article 4 of Protocol No. 4

Inquest into the Death of Cleveland Dodd (2024)

Death of 16-year-old in Unit 18 Casuarina adult prison

To Protect or Punish? UK Counter-Terrorism Impact on Children

Report examining how UK counter-terrorism policies affect children, including surveillance and prosecution impacts.

Death in WA Youth Detention - Accountability Gaps

Youth justice

Tasmania Ashley Youth Detention Centre Closure 2024

North Macedonia Romani Children Education Case

Supreme Court ruled in favour of ERRC on discrimination against Romani children in juvenile detention education. First actio popularis judgment in North Macedonia.

Gurung, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (ACRS meaning - policy interpretation principles)

The case concerns the interpretation of the Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme (ACRS) policy and principles of policy interpretation in immigration matters.

CASE OF M.A. AND Z.R. v. CYPRUS (no. 39090/20)

Whether Cyprus's expulsion of the applicants violated their rights under the prohibition of torture, the prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens and the right to an effective remedy.

CASE OF A.M.A. v. THE NETHERLANDS (no. 23048/19)

Whether the applicant's removal to Bahrain would expose him to a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 (the prohibition of torture).

Children on Remand in QLD Watch Houses (2023)

Children held in adult police watch houses

Held v. Montana - Youth Climate Rights

Landmark case where youth plaintiffs successfully argued Montana violated their constitutional right to a clean environment. First US case affirming youth climate rights.

NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] HCA 37

Whether indefinite immigration detention of a non-citizen who cannot be removed in the reasonably foreseeable future is within Commonwealth power.

CASE OF ISRAILOV v. RUSSIA (no. 21882/09)

Whether the Russian authorities violated the applicant’s right to life, the prohibition of torture and the right to liberty, and whether they conducted an effective investigation into those alleged violations.

CASE OF S.S. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (no. 56417/19)

Whether the applicants' removal to Serbia would constitute a collective expulsion of aliens and expose them to a real risk of treatment contrary to the prohibition of torture.

CASE OF ALHOWAIS v. HUNGARY (no. 59435/17)

Whether Hungary failed to comply with its obligations under the right to life and the prohibition of torture by not conducting an effective investigation and by not protecting the applicant’s right to life.

Dylan Voller Settlement with NT Government (2023)

Compensation for mistreatment in Don Dale

R (AAA (Syria) & ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42

Safety of Rwanda, third country removals; non-refoulement; systemic risks