Back to explore
Justice Matrix · Case profile

A.A. v. Switzerland

European Court of Human RightsEuropean Court of Human Rights2019Europe
FavorableMedium precedent
Strategic issue

What was at stake

The case revolves around the assessment of persecution for religious purposes in the country of origin, specifically focusing on how an applicant's faith practices would be impacted upon return.

Facts

What happened

The applicant, a Hazara of Afghan origin, converted to Christianity while in Switzerland. His case concerned the assessment of the persecution he might face upon return to Afghanistan due to his religious conversion.

Key holding

What the court decided

The European Court of Human Rights decided that national authorities must evaluate how an applicant will live their faith in their country of origin when assessing the likelihood of persecution for religious purposes upon return. The court found that the applicant, being of Hazara ethnic origin and having converted to Christianity in Switzerland, might face persecution in violation of Article 3 ECHR if returned to Afghanistan. The court emphasized the importance of a serious assessment of the consequences of the applicant's conversion.

Reasoning

How the court got there

The Court ruled that national authorities, when assessing the likelihood of religious persecution upon return, must thoroughly evaluate how an applicant would practice their faith in their country of origin. The Court found that the national authority (TAF) had not sufficiently assessed the consequences of the applicant's conversion, which could lead to persecution in violation of Article 3 ECHR if he were returned.

Authorities

Statutes and cases cited

Statutes & treaties
  • § European Convention on Human Rights art. 3
Issue areas

Categories

refugeeasylumreligious-persecution
Source

Authoritative link

Source of record
https://www.asylumlawdatabase.eu
Disclaimer and licence

This is a research and reference resource, not legal advice. Summaries are prepared from public sources and may be incomplete or out of date. Always read the original judgment or document and consult a qualified lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction before acting.

Narrative summaries on this page are licensed CC BY-NC 4.0. Reuse them with attribution to JusticeHub for non-commercial purposes. Original judgments and source documents remain under their own terms; follow the authoritative link for the source of record.