CASE OF D.M. v. SWEDEN (no. 32694/23)
What was at stake
Whether the applicant's expulsion to Afghanistan would expose him to a real risk of treatment contrary to the prohibition of torture under Article 3.
What the court decided
The Court held that the applicant's removal to Afghanistan would expose him to a real risk of torture. Consequently, such removal would constitute a violation of the prohibition of torture under Article 3.
Categories
This is a research and reference resource, not legal advice. Summaries are prepared from public sources and may be incomplete or out of date. Always read the original judgment or document and consult a qualified lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction before acting.
Narrative summaries on this page are licensed CC BY-NC 4.0. Reuse them with attribution to JusticeHub for non-commercial purposes. Original judgments and source documents remain under their own terms; follow the authoritative link for the source of record.