Back to the matrix
Justice Matrix · Insights

The shape of the corpus.

366 cases and 67 campaigns, read across time, outcome, region, and the issues that link cases to campaigns. A working snapshot, not a finished argument.

Outcomes

What courts have done

Of 366 cases in the matrix, 107 (29%) resolved favorably, 32 (9%) adversely, and 28 (8%) remain pending. 199 are not yet tagged with an outcome, a curation gap rather than a substantive one.

Favorable
107
29%
Pending
28
8%
Adverse
32
9%
Untagged
199
54%
Time

When cases were decided

The matrix skews recent: most cases come from the 2020s. Older landmark decisions are present where they remain operative (19802020).

1980s
1
1990s
5
2000s
41
2010s
77
2020s
239
Coverage

Where the matrix has reach

Region labels in the corpus mix continents, country sub-jurisdictions, and the “National” bucket; this snapshot is honest about that mix rather than smoothed.

Issue areas

Where cases and campaigns talk to each other

50 categories appear in both the cases and campaigns sides of the matrix. That overlap is the connective tissue: a lawyer reading a profile can click through to the campaigns mobilising on the same issue, and an organiser can do the reverse.

Top issue areas (cases + campaigns)
Linked both sides
  • youth-justice (1813)
  • refugee (21611)
  • asylum (22511)
  • indigenous-rights (138)
  • human-rights (157)
  • raise-the-age (57)
  • justice-reinvestment (55)
  • detention-conditions (144)
Live state

What's still moving

97% of campaigns in the matrix are tagged ongoing: advocacy work where an organiser can still pick up a phone, a strategy, or a coalition. Newest additions sit at the top.