Strategic litigation, searchable.
219 cases across 14 issue areas. Filter by topic, outcome, or precedent strength. Each profile is a starting point for adaptation, not a finishing line.
- France· 2010
France - Council of State, 10 December 2010, Cimade and others, n° 326704
EDAL summary. The transposition of the Asylum Procedures Directive (APD) in French legislation is incomplete on certain aspects (provision of information to applicants for asylum; access to the report of the person...
refugeeasylum - France· 2010
France - Council of State, 14 June 2010, OFPRA c/ M. A., n°323669
EDAL summary. The involvement in a State regular police force does not constitute, in itself, the expression of political opinions or the membership of a particular social group.
refugeeasylum - France· 2010
France - Council of State, 16 June 2010, Ms. A., n°340250
EDAL summary. French legislative provisions concerning the non suspensive effect of the judicial remedy under the accelerated procedure are not manifestly incompatible with the Asylum Procedures Directive and the R...
refugeeasylum - UK· 2010
UK - House of Lords, 11 October 2010, R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (UKHL) [2005] UKHL 38
EDAL summary. The House of Lords confirmed that in addition to establishing a real risk of harm, the applicant would also have to show that their state has failed to provide reasonable protection.
refugeeasylum - France· 2010
France - Council of State, 7 April 2010, Mr. B., n°319840
EDAL summary. Before applying the exclusion clause in a case of complicity in an honour killing, the Court should inquire whether, on the one hand family constraint might have lowered the free will of the applicant...
refugeeasylum - France· 2010
France - Council of State, 23 July 2010, Amnesty International France and others, n° 336034
EDAL summary. Partial quashing of the list of safe countries of origin: Armenia, Madagascar, Turkey and Mali (women only) removed from the list
refugeeasylum - Hungary· 2010
Hungary - Metropolitan Court, 28 December 2010, A.M. v. Office of Immigration and Nationality, 15.K.34.141/2009/12
EDAL summary. Country of origin information can verify a situation in which the risk of persecution can exceptionally be considered to be proved without substantiating the personal circumstances of the applicant. T...
refugeeasylum - Ireland· 2010
Ireland - High Court, 5 February 2010, S.O. (a minor) v Refugee Appeals Tribunal and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2010] IEHC 151
EDAL summary. This case concerned the treatment of evidence from unaccompanied minors. The applicant was an unaccompanied minor from Afghanistan. He claimed asylum on the basis of a fear of persecution both by the...
refugeeasylum - Ireland· 2010
Ireland - High Court, 28 September 2010, R.M.K. (DRC) v Refugee Appeals Tribunal and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform 2010 IEHC 367
EDAL summary. This case concerned the consideration of expert medical evidence by asylum decision makers and the link with the assessment of credibility. The Court found that the Refugee Appeals Tribunal failed ade...
refugeeasylum - Sweden· 2010
Sweden - Migration Court of Appeal, 6 September 2010, UM 8098-09
EDAL summary. The right to family life can outweigh the ‘state responsibility’ criteria in the Dublin II Regulation. The Court held that the application for asylum should be processed in Sweden, in order to secure...
refugeeasylum - Hungary· 2010
Hungary - Metropolitan Court, 8 April 2010, K.H. v. Office of Immigration and Nationality, 15.K.31.662/2009/16
EDAL summary. The Office of Immigration and Nationality (OIN) rejected an application for asylum and did not assess the risk of serious harm because the applicant was deemed not credible. The Metropolitan Court fou...
refugeeasylum - UK· 2010
UK - Supreme Court, 22 November 2010, MA (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 49
EDAL summary. Where an applicant's account is rejected as incredible, his or her claim will only succeed where there is undisputed objective evidence which goes a long way towards showing that the applicant is none...
refugeeasylum - UK· 2010
UK - Upper Tribunal, 11 November 2010, AW (sufficiency of protection) Pakistan [2011] UKUT 31(IAC)
EDAL summary. In assessing state protection, a judge must look, notwithstanding a general sufficiency of protection in a country, to the individual circumstances of the applicant. In assessing whether an appellant’...
refugeeasylum - France· 2009
France - Council of State, 15 May 2009, Miss K., n°292564
EDAL summary. As soon as one persecution ground (in this case religion) exists and the other conditions for qualifying for refugee status are fulfilled, refugee status must be recognised rather than subsidiary prot...
refugeeasylum - Ireland· 2009
Ireland - High Court, 4 December 2009, M.S.T. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2009] IEHC 529
EDAL summary. This case concerned the interpretation of Article 4(4) of the Qualification Directive and the transposing Irish measure, which had added certain wording. The Court noted that the Directive left it ope...
refugeeasylum - Ireland· 2009
Ireland - High Court, 3 November 2009, D.T. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2009] IEHC 482
EDAL summary. This case concerned the assessment of the option of internal relocation within Sierra Leone in the context of a threat from a family member. The Court found that, provided that regard has been had to...
refugeeasylum - Ireland· 2009
Ireland - High Court, 15 October 2009, G.O.I v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform & Refugee Applications Commissioner [2009] IEHC 463
EDAL summary. This case concerned the interpretation of Article 4.3 of the Qualification Directive and the nature of the assessment of the facts and circumstances of a refugee application that should take place. Th...
refugeeasylum - Hungary· 2009
Hungary - Metropolitan Court, 23 September 2009, M.A.A. v. Office of Immigration and Nationality, 21.K.31484/2009/6
EDAL summary. The Office of Immigration and Nationality (OIN) found the applicant not credible and therefore did not assess the risk of serious harm. Instead the OIN granted protection against refoulement. The Metr...
refugeeasylum - Hungary· 2009
Hungary - Metropolitan Court, 30 September 2009, D.T. v. Office of Immigration and Nationality 17.K.33.301/2008/15
EDAL summary. Subsidiary protection can be granted if on return to their country of origin an applicant would face a real risk of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. The question at issue was whe...
refugeeasylum - Hungary· 2009
Hungary - Metropolitan Court, 2 July 2009, K.A.F v. Office of Immigration and Nationality, 15.K.30.401/2009/12
EDAL summary. The case concerned an appeal against a refusal to grant refugee status on the grounds that the applicant lacked credibility as the country of origin information (COI) submitted by the applicant was no...
refugeeasylum