Back to explore
Justice Matrix · Case profile

Maranguka Justice Reinvestment Evaluation (2018)

New South Wales, AustraliaKPMG Independent Evaluation2018
FavorableHigh precedent
Strategic issue

What was at stake

Community-controlled justice reinvestment in Bourke

Facts

What happened

The Maranguka Justice Reinvestment initiative was a community-led strategy in Bourke, New South Wales, addressing high rates of crime, family violence, and low school attendance within the local Aboriginal community. Facing significant social challenges and over-incarceration, the community, through the Maranguka Maihi Committee, developed and implemented localized solutions to improve justice outcomes and community well-being, diverting people from the criminal justice system and empowering local decision-making.

Key holding

What the court decided

Aboriginal community-controlled program achieved 31:1 ROI. Family violence down 39%, juvenile charges down 38%, school attendance up 31%. Gold standard for justice reinvestment in Australia.

Reasoning

How the court got there

The KPMG independent evaluation concluded the Maranguka program was highly effective by meticulously analyzing data on crime rates, school attendance, and economic impact. Its success was attributed to the community-controlled model, which enabled the development of culturally relevant and effective interventions, directly linking program activities to significant positive shifts in key social indicators and an exceptional return on investment.

Issue areas

Categories

aboriginal-ledbourkeevaluationjustice-reinvestment
Disclaimer and licence

This is a research and reference resource, not legal advice. Summaries are prepared from public sources and may be incomplete or out of date. Always read the original judgment or document and consult a qualified lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction before acting.

Narrative summaries on this page are licensed CC BY-NC 4.0. Reuse them with attribution to JusticeHub for non-commercial purposes. Original judgments and source documents remain under their own terms; follow the authoritative link for the source of record.