CASE OF KHASANOV AND RAKHMANOV v. RUSSIA (no. 28492/15)
What was at stake
Whether the applicants' extradition to Kyrgyzstan would expose them to a real risk of treatment contrary to the prohibition of torture under Article 3.
What the court decided
The Court concluded that the extradition of the applicants to Kyrgyzstan would not give rise to a violation of the prohibition of torture, holding that there was no breach of Article 3.
Categories
This is a research and reference resource, not legal advice. Summaries are prepared from public sources and may be incomplete or out of date. Always read the original judgment or document and consult a qualified lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction before acting.
Narrative summaries on this page are licensed CC BY-NC 4.0. Reuse them with attribution to JusticeHub for non-commercial purposes. Original judgments and source documents remain under their own terms; follow the authoritative link for the source of record.