CASE OF M.H. AND S.B. v. HUNGARY (no. 10940/17)
What was at stake
Whether the applicants' arrest and detention were lawful under the right to liberty and security.
What the court decided
The Court held that Hungary violated the applicants' right to liberty and security because their arrest and detention were not lawful, and ordered the State to pay the applicants non‑pecuniary damages.
Categories
This is a research and reference resource, not legal advice. Summaries are prepared from public sources and may be incomplete or out of date. Always read the original judgment or document and consult a qualified lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction before acting.
Narrative summaries on this page are licensed CC BY-NC 4.0. Reuse them with attribution to JusticeHub for non-commercial purposes. Original judgments and source documents remain under their own terms; follow the authoritative link for the source of record.