CASE OF BIVOLARU AND MOLDOVAN v. FRANCE (no. 40324/16)
What was at stake
Whether the applicants were subjected to treatment that breaches the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment.
What the court decided
The Court held that there was a violation of the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment regarding some of the allegations, but no violation concerning the remaining allegations, and it awarded the applicants a sum for non‑pecuniary damage.
Categories
This is a research and reference resource, not legal advice. Summaries are prepared from public sources and may be incomplete or out of date. Always read the original judgment or document and consult a qualified lawyer in the relevant jurisdiction before acting.
Narrative summaries on this page are licensed CC BY-NC 4.0. Reuse them with attribution to JusticeHub for non-commercial purposes. Original judgments and source documents remain under their own terms; follow the authoritative link for the source of record.